Occasional posts on anthropologically interesting science fiction, anthropological futures and my own future as an anthropologist.
Showing posts with label anthropology by the wire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anthropology by the wire. Show all posts
Monday, June 6, 2022
20th Anniversary of HBO's "The Wire"
In 2011, we started a project entitled "Anthropology By the Wire" with participants drawn mainly from community colleges in the Baltimore area. Our goal was to collaborate with neighborhood-based groups in Baltimore to make anthropologically informed representations of their communities that they could utilize for their own purposes. My co-PI for the project, and my co-author, Matt Durington, explains the whole process in this 2011 video on the YouTube channel for the project. We meant it as a critique of "The Wire"--or, at least, the way "the Wire" had come to stand in for documentary truths about the city. Circling back to the series 20 years, and our project 10 years later, I find that not much has changed. The series continues to have this representational hegemony and, in many ways, still pushes to the sides other representations of Baltimore not grounded in policing and heavily demonized images of drugs and crime.
"The Wire" presented audiences with a superbly acted, nuanced portrait of Baltimore - certainly the most complex mass media representation to date. But it was, in the end, mass media grounded in a white perspective that wants to see Baltimore as a spectacle of abandonment and violence. Yet there were moments when the city seemed to exceed that perspective - when neighborhoods themselves took the stage. Those were our favorite scenes. I know that the camera "wanted" us to see the boarded up houses, weeds and trash - but there are times when we saw the small-scale intimacy of neighborhoods and the interpenetrations of lives in "Smalltimore." As anthropologists, what "The Wire" made us realize is that communities could represent themselves. Also, as time went on, technologies (smart phones, social media) that would help people do that became more and more available. "Anthropology By the Wire" was about building collaborative media with people in neighborhoods to tell stories they wanted to tell in ways that made sense to them. It was piecemeal, production values varied, and, of course, there was no script. In that sense, it was the opposite of "The Wire." But it was still generated in the space opened up by "The Wire."
Thursday, October 4, 2012
"By the Wire," not "Through the Wire"
It has been 10 years since David Simon's "The Wire" premiered on HBO. A product of Simon's long-time partnership with Ed Burns, a retired Baltimore City homicide detective, "The Wire" presented Baltimore through the lens of police officers, drug dealers, troubled children, educators. A Dickensian drama-from-below, Simon's series grew more and more complex through its five seasons. Actively working to challenge easy interpretations of Baltimore's problems, Simon refused to indulge in the usual media reduction of urban life to pathologized caricatures.
Over those 10 years, some anthropologists began to include "The Wire" in their courses, presumably because they found it ethnographically interesting. And it is, but not because it offers an empirical "window" onto the lives of Baltimore's urban poor. Instead, "The Wire" is interesting because it presents the complexities of white, middle-class perspectives on race and social class. It lays bare the tortured contradictions, the logical inconsistencies of dominant theoretical perspectives, from the neo-liberal, rational choice theory used to interpret some of The Wire's more larger-than-life drug-dealers, to the structural interpretations examining the inequalities of education in the city. Ultimately, though, the series remains trapped in the puzzle-box of the racialized other, and the failure of the series to indict the neo-liberal (although Simon certainly tried) points to the inabilities of US intellectuals to conceptualize both race- and class inequality. Bouncing between reformer, radical and reactionary, "the Wire" is probably the best portrait we have today of U.S. urban policy, one that accurately represents the hypostatized contradictions urban lawmakers and pundits bounce impotently between in their perpetual efforts to prescribe a "cure" to the problem of the urban.
In that sense, Peter Beilenson's and Patrick McGuire's Tapping Into The Wire: The Real Urban Crisis (The Johns Hopkins Press, 2012), is a logical next step. In a series of reflections on his 13 years as Baltimore's public health commissioner (1992-2005), Beilenson examines scenes and characters in The Wire as synecdoches of public health problems inflicting US cities. As he reflects, "I realized then that it was a perfect crystallization of all of the public health and social problems I had faced in real-life Baltimore during my thirteen years as health commissioner" (4).
Each chapter focuses on a health problem (drugs, STD's, HIV), and Beilenson's response to it as commissioner. Some of these stories are heroic--e.g., Beilenson's needle-exchange program and his work on a plan for universal health care for Baltimore. Some, less so. In fact, my only memory of Beilenson during his tenure is his infamous support for Norplant, a birth-control implant that he wanted to offer to at-risk teens, a plan that led to charges of eugenics. Later, there was similar controversy over Depo-Provera. Here, he defends those programs, and there is little doubt that he had the City's best interests at heart. But he still comes across as disingenuously political. As he writes,
Still, Beilenson's anecdotes are reminders that enlightened public health policy can make concrete changes in the lives of people, and that so many of the things conservatives interpret as the intransigent moral failing of individuals are, in fact, public health problems that impact all of us. Perhaps we can bring Beilenson back from Howard County (where he continues as health officer of Howard County).
But Tapping Into the Wire also sharply contrasts with our approach in Anthropology By the Wire. Ultimately, Beilenson and McGuire still take their cues from The Wire and, by extension, hegemonic representations of Baltimore in mass media that define the city and its citizens as a series of problems, as a negative values in indicators for health, education and crime. The difference: we're starting from the opposite end, building media that begin with people's lives and experiences, not in order to provide fodder for political pathologizations, but to help people represent themselves to each other, and to other institutions and agents of change who might be of benefit to them. In other words, "By The Wire": in the same places, the same neighborhoods, but getting an altogether different story.
Over those 10 years, some anthropologists began to include "The Wire" in their courses, presumably because they found it ethnographically interesting. And it is, but not because it offers an empirical "window" onto the lives of Baltimore's urban poor. Instead, "The Wire" is interesting because it presents the complexities of white, middle-class perspectives on race and social class. It lays bare the tortured contradictions, the logical inconsistencies of dominant theoretical perspectives, from the neo-liberal, rational choice theory used to interpret some of The Wire's more larger-than-life drug-dealers, to the structural interpretations examining the inequalities of education in the city. Ultimately, though, the series remains trapped in the puzzle-box of the racialized other, and the failure of the series to indict the neo-liberal (although Simon certainly tried) points to the inabilities of US intellectuals to conceptualize both race- and class inequality. Bouncing between reformer, radical and reactionary, "the Wire" is probably the best portrait we have today of U.S. urban policy, one that accurately represents the hypostatized contradictions urban lawmakers and pundits bounce impotently between in their perpetual efforts to prescribe a "cure" to the problem of the urban.
In that sense, Peter Beilenson's and Patrick McGuire's Tapping Into The Wire: The Real Urban Crisis (The Johns Hopkins Press, 2012), is a logical next step. In a series of reflections on his 13 years as Baltimore's public health commissioner (1992-2005), Beilenson examines scenes and characters in The Wire as synecdoches of public health problems inflicting US cities. As he reflects, "I realized then that it was a perfect crystallization of all of the public health and social problems I had faced in real-life Baltimore during my thirteen years as health commissioner" (4).
Each chapter focuses on a health problem (drugs, STD's, HIV), and Beilenson's response to it as commissioner. Some of these stories are heroic--e.g., Beilenson's needle-exchange program and his work on a plan for universal health care for Baltimore. Some, less so. In fact, my only memory of Beilenson during his tenure is his infamous support for Norplant, a birth-control implant that he wanted to offer to at-risk teens, a plan that led to charges of eugenics. Later, there was similar controversy over Depo-Provera. Here, he defends those programs, and there is little doubt that he had the City's best interests at heart. But he still comes across as disingenuously political. As he writes,
Although certainly not the only reason, I think it is clear that the provision of contraception in our school-based health centers helped Baltimore drop from having the highest teen birth rate in the country to the number 15 ranking: over the past twenty years, the city's teen birth rate dropped by more than 40 percent. (118)First, there's a suspicious, semantic shift from Norplant and Depo-Provera to general contraception. I think making contraception available in schools is an important intervention--but which ones? Second, it's unclear how much these interventions are responsible for dropping teen birth rates. Teen pregnancies have been dropping nationally by about 3 percent per year since 1991. The CDC is not entirely certain why this rate has dropped, and it seems like a bit of shell game to suggest that Norplant led to the Baltimore decline.
Still, Beilenson's anecdotes are reminders that enlightened public health policy can make concrete changes in the lives of people, and that so many of the things conservatives interpret as the intransigent moral failing of individuals are, in fact, public health problems that impact all of us. Perhaps we can bring Beilenson back from Howard County (where he continues as health officer of Howard County).
But Tapping Into the Wire also sharply contrasts with our approach in Anthropology By the Wire. Ultimately, Beilenson and McGuire still take their cues from The Wire and, by extension, hegemonic representations of Baltimore in mass media that define the city and its citizens as a series of problems, as a negative values in indicators for health, education and crime. The difference: we're starting from the opposite end, building media that begin with people's lives and experiences, not in order to provide fodder for political pathologizations, but to help people represent themselves to each other, and to other institutions and agents of change who might be of benefit to them. In other words, "By The Wire": in the same places, the same neighborhoods, but getting an altogether different story.
Monday, July 16, 2012
Tagging Anthropology
In a 2010 article entitled “Academic Search Engine
Optimization (ASEO),” Joeran Beel et al sparked controversy in some circles by suggesting
that scientists tailor their writing in research articles to search engines in
order to maximize web visibility.
Once the keywords are chosen, they need to be mentioned in the right places: in the title, and as often as possible in the abstract and the body of the text (but, of course, not so often as to annoy readers). Although in general titles should be fairly short, we suggest choosing a longer title if there are many relevant keywords. (179)
Building on almost 15 years of literature and scholarship in web marketing and e-commerce, Beel et al extended the model to academic work, arguing that the goal in writing for academic journals is little different than writing copy for web advertising: “to make this content more widely and easily available” (190). That could mean including keywords in significant fields (like the title) or it could mean increasing the number of inbound links, another method for SEO practiced by web developers everywhere. It means, in other words, scientists utilizing the same methods as, say, websites selling Viagra and dietary supplements.
Is anthropology the same?
In the era of “public anthropology,” isn’t the idea to reach a “public”? But what is this “public”? Despite lots of lip service and theoretical
interest in expanding the audience for anthropological research,
anthropologists seem to have little more than a vague sense of the public that
might exist outside of the immediate academic context. This
question becomes more urgent with the advent of web 2.0 social networking. When we’re blogging or putting something up
on Youtube, it seems obvious that we’re making our work “public,” but that
public is not synonymous with the “public” of television news or major
newspapers. Danah boyd has suggested a
useful distinction in her definition of “networked publics”:
I am primarily talking about the spaces
and audiences that are bound together through technological networks (i.e., the
Internet, mobile networks, etc.).
Networked publics are one type of mediated public; the network mediates
the interactions between members of the public.
(boyd: 125)
Neither
entirely public nor entirely private, “networked publics” imply both the
networked creation of a public (the public forged as a series of connections
with content and with other members of that networked public) and the networked
determination of the access to public content (through search engines,
page-ranking, and meta-data). Rather
than an amorphous “public” made up of concerned citizens, these networked
publics are forged consciously by people networking together and by corporations
exploiting their sociality in order to add value to their social networking
sites.
The “public” here, in other words, is one that is
consciously crafted, negotiated, directed and emergent. It is one that we might enjoin through a
variety of means: keywords, tags, links, repetition. For the scholars and consultants who work on
search engine optimization, this means maximizing the number of “hits”, but for
anthropologists disseminating work through Web 2.0, the issues of the “public”
should be more complex. The construction
of an anthropological public needs to be part of our research from the outset.
Of course, this seems counterintuitive to those of us socialized
in more traditional academic publishing where write-up is followed by
publication and dissemination. In this
linear process, the question of a public is ultimately the province of
marketing. But in networked publishing,
there are at least two differences.
First, it’s up to us to forge those connections with a community of
readers and writers (web 2.0 blurs that distinction). Second, it’s also up to us to encourage the association
of our work with a body of other works—e.g., our anthropological media of
Baltimore with anthropological media about other cities. The difference here is that we do this not
for profit, but for the effectiveness of our intervention. That is, a public anthropology in the age of
networked media needs to create its public while it’s doing anthropology, a consciously
forged interpretive community.
References
Beel, Joeran, Bela Gipp and Erik Wilde (2010). “Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO).” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 41(2): 176-190.
boyd, danah (2008). “Why Youth ♥ Social Network Sites.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, ed. by David Buckingham, pp. 119-142. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Cybernetics and Anthropology - Past and Present
I continue to wrestle with the legacy of cybernetics in anthropology - and a future premised on an anthropological bases for the digital. ...
-
By Own screenshot, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=26632754 I watch people on the Seoul subway playing 쿠키런 (Cookie Run)...
-
There are 3 approaches to generative AI in the classroom: 1) an outright ban on it; 2) a limited use policy that covers certain assignme...
-
I continue to wrestle with the legacy of cybernetics in anthropology - and a future premised on an anthropological bases for the digital. ...