For anthropology, remix always sounded better than it looked in practice. After all, even though it is hard to argue with Jenkins's writings on "Remix culture," it always seemed to mean more for music, art, literature and--primarily--for popular culture. In anthropology, what does "remix" mean? Does it mean self-plagiarism? Does it mean taking images or media and re-using them in other contexts? Colonialism and cultural appropriation under another name? As my colleague Matthew Durington and I write in our book, Networked Anthropology (70): For anthropology, the problem of remix isn't that it's so new, but that it's so old. What seems progressive and egalitarian when it comes to creating parodies of repressive legislation or "culture jamming" corporate hegemony looks decidedly less so when we apply the ethic to what gets defined as culturally or socially "other." Given the past of Western anthropology, it is not especi...