Skip to main content

Ellis Island and Liberty Island Projects


 


 
The Statue of Liberty National Monument consists of two islands: Liberty Island (which hosts the State of Liberty) and Ellis Island, the site of the Ellis Island immigration station and an associated hospital complex. Liberty Island became a national monument under Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Ellis Island was included in the site in the 1960s. During its heyday from the late 19th century until its closure in the 1950s, 12 million people were processed on Ellis island, and it is for many the symbol of immigration in the United States. The Statue of Liberty plays a similar role. As Emma Lazarus’s 1883 poem, “The New Colossus," proclaims: Give me your tired, your poor,/ Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,/ The wretched refuse of your teeming shore./ Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,/I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” Indeed, the State of Liberty seems to beckon across the ocean to oppressed people everywhere, and, for many the Statue is a symbol of the hope for a new life in the United States.

Yet both islands have quite separate histories and roles. Ellis Island was an actual port of entry for millions, while the Statue of Liberty initially had nothing to do with immigration.  In addition, both have at times symbolized the opposite of immigration and hope–exlcusion, racism, xenophobia and incarceration. In 2021, we received a grant from the National Park Service to work with interpretive materials on Ellis Island, and another grant from NPS through ASALH (the Association for the Study of African American Life and History) to explore the meanings of the Statue of Liberty for African Americans. Both of these gave us the opportunity to examine alternative stories and experiences of both Ellis Island and Liberty Island, and both have resulted in two different–but equally complex–projects. In the case of national monuments, the goal has often been to restrict them to a single set of meanings and significations, but Ellis Island and Liberty are much more than any single narrative. 

What brings these two projects together is an emphasis on community collaboration and multimodal anthropology. Both were made through our work a team of scholars (including Samuel Collins, Matthew Durington, Monica Pelayo and Chayanne Marcano), and with Wide Angle Youth Media, a non-profit in Baltimore that instructs youth in multimedia production and seeks to address the many digital divides that persist in U.S. cities today. 

Our goal for both was to open up that discourse to incorporate forgotten, suppressed and alternative meanings. It’s worth pointing out that both of these function as a commentary on other interpretive materials on the Monument, and our hope is that both open up other possibilities at a particularly fraught moment in U.S. history. 


Ellis Island Encounters ( https://www.ellisislandencounters.org/)

The Ellis Island Encounters website is designed to be read in different ways. First, it presents Ellis Island according to a well-established chronology from pre-colonization to the present (“Historic Periods”). These include Ellis Island in its heyday as a port of entry (1892-1924), its transformation into a port of deportation and a prison (1924-1954), and its afterlife in the U.S. imagination (1954-present). Second, the website presents “Stories of Ellis Island.” Taking our cues from the ways the site is interpreted, and the autobiographical narratives people have shared, the “Stories” portion presents a variety of thematic narratives that include personal experiences, incidents, and general themes. 

The Statue of Liberty site is a collection of short articles, archival materials and popular images, arranged into overlapping thematic clusters. The scope of the project was to elicit the meanings of the State of Liberty for Black people, and we have endeavored to do that through the historical record and the popular imagination. The site invites visitors to jump around through image and cluster, rather than explore in any linear way. 




 

 


 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Networked, Not Virtual: ethnography when you can't go there

(from our storymap ) In my capacity as a fellow in our faculty research center, I've been doing a lot of support work for the unexpected shift to learning-at-a-distance.  At my uni, very few of us have experience teaching online.  The faculty (generally) aren't especially enthusiastic, and there hasn't really been a lot of institutional support.  So, I wasn't surprised when most of the questions I was fielding took the form of: "I do X in my class.  How can I do X online?"  Not surprised because that's the ideological frame distance education has relied upon: an exact homology between offline- and online teaching, with the physical classroom replaced by the discussion board, the lectures by videos.  But actual online courses (not our band aid efforts to stitch together something in a few days) are structured very differently than their physical counterparts.  The best classes maximize their digital affordances and don’t try to simply "reprodu...

SETI: Signs in space/ Enacting space

[From the SETI project, "A Sign in Space" ( https://asignin.space/ )]  “To interpret is to impoverish, to deplete the world — in order to set up a shadow world of ‘meanings,’ Susan Sontag, Against Interpretation  In May, the SETI Institute Artist-in-Residence initiated a piece of collaborative performance–the decoding of an “alien” message, transmitted from the European Space Agency's ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO). “A Sign in Space” is a simulation that enlists ordinary people in the work of “decoding” an alien message–one that you can download yourself. Along the way, SETI has hosted a series of workshops (including one from anthropologist Willi Lempert ) designed to help participants through the decoding process–including hints on avoiding ethnocentric (and anthropocentric) assumptions about what this communication could be and what the intentions of extraterrestrial intelligence might entail.  I am a very enthusiastic SETI advocate, but I wonder if “decoding” is re...

Turing Tests and ChatGPT’s Sleight of Hand

  One of the many benchmarks for AI is the “Turing test,” Alan Turing’s adaptation of the “imitation game” where an interrogator must decide which of two respondents is a computer. It is, as many have pointed out, a strangely indirect test, one that depends on the credulity of the human interrogator and the capacity of the machine to deceive (Wooldridge 2020). Will they believe the computer? And will the computer be a good enough liar? As Pantsar (2025) comments, “For the machine to pass the test, it needs to impersonate a human successfully enough to fool the interrogator. But this is puzzling in the wide context of intelligence ascriptions. Why would intelligence be connected to a form of deception?”   On the one hand, measuring AI through its deceptive power has the benefit of avoiding the idiocy of attempting to establish a measure of intelligence, a task deeply imbricated in racial eugenics (Bender and Hanna 2025; Wooldridge 2020). On the other, generative AI applicat...